|
|
|
|
|
Dept. Head, AT&T Labs Research |
|||||
|
|
(NOTE:
Some of the older papers are hard to find in electronic form. Links marked with
an asterisk (*) are as similar to the published paper as I could find.) Journals 1. Church, K., and Patil, R. (1982) “Coping with Syntactic Ambiguity
or How to Put the Block in the Box on the Table,” American Journal
of Computational Linguistics, Volume 8, Number 3-4, July-December. 2. Church, K. (1987)
“Phonological Parsing and Lexical Retrieval” Cognition,
Volume 25, pp. 53-69. ps 3. Church, K., and
Hanks, P., “Word Association Norms, Mutual Information and
Lexicography,” Computational Linguistics, Vol
16:1, pp. 22-29, (1991). ps 4. Church, K., and
Gale, W., “A Comparison of the Enhanced Good-Turing and Deleted
Estimation Methods for Estimating Probabilities of English Bigrams,” Computer Speech and Language, 5:1,
(1991). 5. Church, K., and
Gale, W. (1991) “Probability Scoring for Spelling Correction,”
Statistics and Computing. ps (missing figures) 6. Church, K., review
of Aarts, J., and Meijs,
W. (eds.) (1991) “Theory and Practice in Corpus Linguistics” Rodopi, Amesterdam, Computational
Linguistics. 7. Gale, W., and
Church, K. (1993) “A Program for Aligning Sentences in Bilingual
Corpora,” Computational Linguistics, 19:1, pp. 75-102. ps (figures
missing) text (containing useful
appendix) see related
conference paper 8. Gale, W., Church,
K. and Yarowsky, D. (1993) “A Method for Disambiguating Word Senses in
a Large Corpus,” Computers and Humanities, 26: 415-439. ps 9. Church, K. and Helfman, J. (1993) “Dotplot:
a Program for Exploring Self-Similarity in Millions of Lines of Text and
Code,” The Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,
2:2, pp. 153-174. ps related pages 10.Church, K. and
Mercer, R. (1993) “Introduction to the Special Issue on Computational
Linguistics Using Large Corpora,” Computational Linguistics,
19:1, pp. 1-24. ps 11.Church, K. and Hovy, E. (1993) “Good Applications for Crummy
Machine Translation,” Machine Translation, vol
8, pp. 239-258. ps 12.Church, K. and Rau,
L. (1995) “Commercial Applications of Natural Language
Processing,” Communications of the ACM, pp. 71-79. ps 13.Church, K. and
Gale, W. (1995) “Poisson Mixtures,” Journal of Natural
Language Engineering. ps 14.Isabelle, P. and
Church, K. (eds.) (1997) special issue of Machine Translation, vol 12:1/2, Kluwer. 15.Dagan, 16.Yamamoto, M. and
Church, K (2001) “Using Suffix Arrays to compute Term Frequency and
Document Frequency for All Substrings in a Corpus,” Computational
Linguistics, vol 27:1, pp. 1-30, MIT Press. pdf related links
Patents 1. 4,829,580
“Text analysis system with letter sequence recognition and speech
stress assignment arrangement.” 2. 5,146,405
“Methods for part-of-speech determination and usage.” 3. 5,283,833
“Method and apparatus for speech processing using morphology and
rhyming.” 4. 5,541,836
“Word disambiguation apparatus and methods.” 5. 5,572,423
“Method for correcting spelling using error frequencies.” 6. 5,608,622
“System for analyzing translations.” 7. 5,647,023
“Method of nonlinear filtering of degraded document images.” Conference Proceedings 1. Church, K., (1979)
“Co-ordinate Squares: A Solution to Many Chess Pawn Endgames,”
(abbreviated version of B.S. Thesis), International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, 2. Church, K. (1980)
“On Parsing Strategies and Closure,” Association for
Computational Linguistics. pdf
(direct from ACL) 3. Church, K. (1983)
“A Finite-State Parser for Use in Speech Recognition,” Association
for Computational Linguistics. pdf
(direct from ACL) 4. Church, K. (1983)
“Allophonic and Phonotactic Constraints are
Useful,” International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,
5. Church, K. (1983)
“A Finite-State Parser for Use in Speech Recognition,” Journal
of the Acoustical Society of 6. Ejerhed, E., and Church, K. (1983)
“Finite State Parsing,” in Karlsson, F.
(ed), Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian
Conference of Linguistics, 7. Church, K. (1985)
“Stress Assignment in Letter to Sound Rules for Speech
Synthesis,” Association for Computational Linguistics. pdf
(direct from ACL) ps 8. Church, K. (1986)
“Morphological Decomposition and Stress Assignment for Speech
Synthesis,” Association for Computation Linguistics. pdf
(direct from ACL) 9. Church, K. (1987)
“Three Classes of + Boundaries,” The Eleventh International
Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 10.Church, K. (1988)
“A Stochastic Parts Program and Noun Phrase Parser for Unrestricted
Text,” Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing,
11.Koskenniemi, K., and Church K. (1988)
“Complexity, Two-Level Morphology and Finnish,” Coling, 12.Church, K. (1989)
“Syntactic Parsing May Not Help Speech Recognition Very Much,” in
Working Notes of the AAAI Symposium: Text-Based Intelligent Systems. 13.Church, K., and
Hanks, P. (1989) “Word Association Norms, Mutual Information and
Lexicography,” Association for Computational Linguistics, 14.Church, K., and
Gale, W. (1989) “Enhanced Good-Turing and Cat-Cal: Two New Methods for
Estimating Probabilities of English Bigrams,”
Second Darpa Workshop on Speech and Natural
Language, 15.Church, K., and Hindle, D. (1990) “Collocational
Constraints and Corpus-Based Linguistics,” in Working Notes of the
AAAI Symposium: Text-Based Intelligent Systems. 16.Church, K., and
Gale, W. (1990) “Poor Estimates of Context are Worse than None,” Third Darpa
Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, 17.Kernighan, M.,
Church, K., Gale, W (1990) “A Spelling Correction Program Based on a
Noisy Channel Model,” Coling, 18.Coker, C., Church,
K., Liberman, M. (1990) “Morphology and
Rhyming: Two Powerful Alternatives to Letter-to-Sound Rules for Speech
Synthesis,” European Speech Communication Association, Conference on
Speech Synthesis. ps 19.Gale, W. A. and K.
W. Church (1990) “Estimation Procedures for Language Context: Poor
Estimates are Worse than None,” Proceedings in
Computational Statistics, 1990, p.69-74, Physica-Verlag,
20.Gale, W., and
Church, K. (1991) “Identifying Word Correspondences in Parallel
Text,” Fourth Darpa Workshop on Speech and
Natural Language, Asilomar, pp. 152-157. ps* 21.Gale, W., and
Church, K. (1991) “A Program for Aligning Sentences in Bilingual Corpora,” Association for
Computational Linguistics. pdf
(direct from ACL) 22.Church, K. (1991)
“Some Statistical Opportunities in Speech and Language,” 23rd
Symposium on the Interface, Computing Science and Statistics, 23.Church, K. (1991)
“Concordances for Parallel Text,” Seventh Annual Conference of
the UW Centre for the New OED and Text Research, 24.Church, K. and Hovy, E. (1991) “Good Applications for Crummy
Machine Translation,” in Neal, J. and Walter, S. Natural Language
Processing Systems Evaluation Workshop, University of California,
Berkeley, CA. 25.Church, K. and
Gale, W. (1992) “One Sense per Discourse,” Proceedings of
Fifth DARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language. ps 26.Gale, W., Church,
K., Yarowsky, D. (1992) “Estimating Upper and Lower Bounds on the
Performance of Word-Sense Disambiguation Programs,” Association for
Computational Linguistics. ps 27.Gale, W., Church,
K., Yarowsky, D. (1992) “Using Bilingual Materials to Develop Word
Sense Disambiguation Methods, TMI, 28.Church, K. and Helfman, J. (1992) “Dotplot:
a Program for Exploring Self-Similarity in Millions of Lines of Text and
Code,” Interface. 29.Gale, W., Church,
K. and Yarowsky, D. (1992) “Work on Statistical Methods for Word Sense
Disambiguation,” Proceedings AAAI Fall Workshop on Statistics in
Natural Language. 30.Church, K. (1993)
“Char_align: A Program for Aligning Parallel
Texts at the Character Level,” Association for Computational
Linguistics, pp. 1-8. pdf
(direct from ACL) ps 31.Dagan, 32.Church, K., Dagan, 33.Church, K., Gale,
W., Helfman, J., Lewis, D. (1994) “Fax: An
Alternative to SGML,” Coling. ps 34.Fung, P. and
Church, K. (1994) “K-vec: A New Approach for
Aligning Parallel Texts,” Coling. ps 35.Dagan, 36.Agazzi, O., Church, K., and Gale, W.
(1994), “Using OCR and Equalization to Downsample
Documents,” Proceedings of the 12th International
Conference on Pattern Recognition, 37.Church, K. (1995)
“One Term or Two?” Proceedings of the 18th Annual
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval, pp. 310-318. ps 38.Church, K. and
Gale, W. (1995) “Inverse Document Frequency (IDF): A Measure of
Deviation from Poisson,” Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Very
Large Corpora, pp. 121-130. ps 39.Caldwell, D.,
Church, K. and Fowler, G. (1998), “Using Quantitative Methods to
Compress Call Detail: From Data Warehousing to Data Publishing,” Symposium
on Quantitative Analysis for Decision Making, pp. 71-79. 40.Yamamoto, M. and
Church, K (1998) “Using Suffix Arrays to Compute Term Frequency and
Document Frequency for All Substrings in a Corpus,” Proceedings of
the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pp. 28-37. 41.Belanger, D.,
Church, K. and Hume, A. (1999) Virtual Data Warehousing, Data Publishing, and
Call Detail, pp. 106-117, W. Jonker (eds.)
“Databases in Telecommunications 1999, International Workshop Co-located
with VLDB-99,” Edinburgh, Scotland, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, Vol. 1819, Springer, 2000, ISBN 3-540-67667-9 http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/vldbw/vldbw1999.html.
doc* 42.Ozawa, T.,
Yamamoto, M., Umemura, K., Church, K. (1999) Japanese word segmentation using
similarity measure for IR. In Proceedings of the First NTCIR Workshop on
Research in Japanese Text Retrieval and Term Recognition. 43.Buchsbaum, A., Caldwell, D., Church, K.,
Fowler, G. and Muthukrishnan, S. (2000), “Engineering
the Compression of Massive Tables: An Experimental Approach,” in Proc.
11th ACM-SIAM Symp. on
Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 175-184. pdf related links 44.Church, K. (2000),
“Empirical Estimates of Adaptation: The chance of Two Noriega's is closer to p/2 than p2,” Coling, pp. 173-179. pdf ps 45.Umemura, K. and
Church, K. (2000), “Empirical Term Weighting and Expansion
Frequency,” Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and
Very Large Corpora, pp. 117-123. pdf 46.Yamamoto, E.,
Yamamoto, M., Umemura, K. and Church, K. (2000) “Dynamic Programming: A
Method for Taking Advantage of Technical Terminology in Japanese
Documents,” Information Retrieval with Asian Languages (IRAL),
pp. 125-132. 47.Feng, L., Umemura, K., Yamamoto, M.
and Church, K. (2000) “Using Variable Length Ngrams
for Retrieving Technical Abstracts in Japanese,” Information
Retrieval with Asian Languages (IRAL), pp. 213-214. 48.Sable, C. and
Church, K. (2001) “Using Bins to Empirically Estimate Term Weights for
Text Categorization,” 2001 Conference on
Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2001). ps alternate 49.Sable, C. McKeown, K., and Church, K.
(2002) "NLP Found Helpful (at least for one Text Categorization Task),"
in Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural
Language Processing (EMNLP), 50.Church, K. (2003) “Speech and Language Processing: Where have
we been and where are we going,” Eurospeech, Books 1. Church, K. (1988) Phonological
Parsing in Speech Recognition, Kluwer. 2. Armstrong, S.,
Church, K., Isabelle, P., Manzi, S., Tzoukermann, E. and Yarowksky,
D. (eds.) (1999), Natural Language Processing Using Very Large Corpora, Kluwer. Book Chapters 1. Church, R., and
Church, K. (1977) “Plans, Goals, and Search Strategies for the Seleciton of a Move in Chess,” in Frey, P. (ed), Chess Skill in Man and Machine, Springer-Verlag. 2. Martin, W., Church,
K., and Patil, R. (1987) “Preliminary
Analysis of a Breadth-First Parsing Algorithm: Theoretical and Experimental
Results,” L.Bolc (ed.), Natural Language
Parsing Systems, Springer-Verlag. 3. Church, K. (1987)
“Phonological Parsing and Lexical Retrieval” in Frauenfelder, U. and Tyler, L., (ed)
Spoken Word Recognition, MIT Press. 4. Church, K, Gale,
W., Hanks, P., Hindle, D. (1991) “Parsing,
Word Associations and Typical Predicate-Argument Relations,” in Tomita,
M.(ed.) Current Issues in
Parsing Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Boston, MA. ps 5. Church, K., Hanks,
P., Hindle, D., Gale, W. (1991) “Using
Statistics in Lexical Analysis,” in Zernik (ed), Lexical Acquisition: Using On-line Resources to
Build a Lexicon, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 115-164. ps 6. Liberman, M., and Church, K. (1991)
“Text Analysis and Word Pronunciation in Text-to-Speech
Synthesis,” in Furui, S., and Sondhi, M. (eds.), Advances in Speech Signal
Processing. ps* 7. Church, K., Hanks,
P., Hindle, D., Gale, W., Moon, R., “Substitutablity,” in Atkins and Zampolli
(ed.), (1994), Computational Approaches to the Lexicon Automating the
Lexicon II Schema, Oxford University Press, pp. 153-180. ps 8. Church, K,
“Text Analysis,” in Mellish (ed.), (to
appear) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Pergamon
Press, Aberdeen University Press. 9. Church, K.,
“Comments on Computational Learning Model for Metrical
Phonology,” Levine, R. (ed.), Formal Grammar: Theory and
Implementation, Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science Series, UBC Press,
Vol. 2 (1992). ps 10.Church, K. (1992)
“Current Practice in Part of Speech Tagging and Suggestions for the
Future,” in Simmons (ed.), Abornik praci: In Honor of Henry Kucera,
Michigan Slavic Studies, pp. 13-48. ps 11.Gale, W. and
Church, K. (1993) “Statistical Approaches to Aligning Sentences and
Identifying Word Correspondences in Parallel Texts: a Report on Work in
Progress,” in D. J. Hand (ed.) Artificial Intelligence Frontiers in
Statistics, AI and Statistics III, pp. 281-294. 12.Gale, W. and Church,
K. (1994) “What's Wrong with Adding One?” in N. Oostdijk and P. de Haan (eds.),
Corpus-Based Research into Languge: In honour of Jan Aarts, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 189-200. ps 13.Gale, W. and
Church, K. (1994) “Discrimination Decisions in 100,000 Dimensional
Spaces,” in A. Zampolli, N. Calzolari and M. Palmer (eds.), Current Issues in
Computational Linguisitcs: In honour
of Don Walker, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The
Netherlands, pp. 429-550. ps Tutorials 1. Ngrams, ACL 1995. ps 2. NLP Techniques
and Text Retrieval, Lugano 3. Unix for Poets ps 4. Applications of
Text Analysis
ps 5. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing:
What's Happened Since the First SIGDAT Meeting?
NAACL-2000 abstract, slides &
handout Invited Talks 1. EACL-1993 2. What’s Happened Since the First SIGDAT Meeting?, SIGDAT-1999 ppt 3. Empiricism form TMI-1992 to AMTA-2002 to AMTA-2012: Have IBM Models 1-5 failed to solve all the world's problems? AMTA-2002 ppt
|
|||||
